Nan Inc Lawsuits: Understanding the Legal History

Nan Inc, a construction company based in Honolulu, Hawaii, has been involved in several lawsuits over the years. These lawsuits have covered a range of issues, including contract disputes, allegations of fraud, and workplace safety violations. Understanding the legal history of Nan Inc can provide valuable insights into the company’s practices and reputation within the construction industry.

1. Contract Disputes

Nan Inc has been embroiled in several contract disputes over the years. One notable case involved a dispute with the City and County of Honolulu over a $50 million contract to build a new police station. The dispute arose when Nan Inc claimed that the city had improperly terminated the contract, leading to a lengthy legal battle.

Luckily these are not the biggest lawsuit problems. The latest lawsuit concerned the rail-related whistleblower lawsuit. You can find more info about that case below.

2. Latest Nan Inc Lawsuit: Rail-Related Whistleblower Lawsuit

Nan Inc, a prominent construction company based in Honolulu, Hawaii, found itself at the center of a significant legal controversy related to a rail project and allegations of whistleblower retaliation. The case, which unfolded over several years, sheds light on the complexities of whistleblower protections and the challenges faced by employees who speak out against perceived wrongdoing in the workplace.

Background of the Rail Project

The controversy surrounding Nan Inc began in 2010 when the company was awarded a contract to work on Honolulu’s rail transit project, a large-scale infrastructure initiative aimed at creating a more efficient public transportation system on the island of Oahu. Nan Inc’s involvement in the project was substantial, with the company responsible for significant construction work related to the rail system’s development.

Whistleblower Allegations

Bosko Petricevic claimed that Nan Inc terminated his employment after he raised concerns about potential “illegal activity” associated with the multi-billion-dollar transit project. He filed a lawsuit against Nan Inc in 2019, alleging in state court that the company had been involved in various illegal practices, not all of which were related to the rail project. The case culminated on Wednesday, July 21, 2021, when a jury sided with Nan Inc’s owner, Patrick Shin. The jury concluded that there was no evidence to support Petricevic’s claim that he was fired because of his whistleblowing. Additionally, the jury dismissed Nan Inc’s counterclaim that Petricevic had defamed the company’s CEO, as indicated in the verdict sheet.

Legal Proceedings and Outcome

In the end, the jury ruled in favor of Nan Inc. The jury determined that Petricevic had not provided sufficient evidence to support his claim that he was fired because of his whistleblowing activities.

Additionally, the jury dismissed Nan Inc’s counterclaim that Petricevic had misrepresented the company’s founder, Nan Shin, in a negative light, as stated in the verdict sheet.

This verdict confirms that Nan, Inc.’s decision to terminate the plaintiff was lawful and appropriate,” Shin stated in a press release on Thursday. “This favorable outcome validates the hard work of all Nan, Inc. employees and the positive reputation we have built in the community over the past 30 years.”

You can learn more about this lawsuit here.

3. Workplace Safety Violations

Workplace safety violations have also been a concern for Nan Inc. In 2017, the company was fined $745,000 by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for multiple safety violations related to a construction project in Hawaii. The violations included failing to provide adequate fall protection for workers and exposing workers to electrical hazards.

4. Other Legal Issues

Nan Inc has also faced legal challenges related to its business practices. In 2019, the company was sued by a former employee who alleged that he was wrongfully terminated after reporting safety violations on a construction site. The lawsuit alleged that Nan Inc had violated whistleblower protection laws by retaliating against the employee for raising safety concerns.

Conclusion

Nan Inc has been involved in several lawsuits over the years, covering a range of issues including contract disputes, allegations of fraud, and workplace safety violations. These legal challenges have raised questions about the company’s practices and reputation within the construction industry. Understanding the legal history of Nan Inc can provide valuable insights for stakeholders and help inform decisions regarding future business dealings with the company.